|
Hitlet
Feb 24, 2008 0:51:47 GMT -5
Post by Lincoln on Feb 24, 2008 0:51:47 GMT -5
Did Hitler's appearance make extreme nationalism more appealing to him. He wasn't exactly a looker. A loyal nationalist none the less. A million Jf.k's cannot equal one Hitlet.
|
|
|
Hitlet
Feb 24, 2008 1:44:47 GMT -5
Post by -BlazeBhangra- on Feb 24, 2008 1:44:47 GMT -5
You consider Hitler to be the best, most ruthless leader ever,
He looks like a little b.itch compared to Joseph Stalin,
Stalin killed twice as many of his OWN people than Hitler has enemies, Stalin had a choice to either hand over a high ranking german officer in return of his son, he said forget it and let his son die.
Stalin isent credited enough, everyone knows of Hitler as if he was the most ruthless of all, but its Stalin the man of steel, thats what his last name means. Stalin is the one that defeated Hitler, Stalin is the one to industRIAAlize his country extremely fast, by sacrificing his own people he built Russia, He killed his wife too you have to understand this concentration camp BS about Hitler isent crap compared to what Stalin has been doing, he would say I want 20 spys in this area captured n killed, then even if the NKVD, NKPD forgot the secret service name, was only able to find 17, then their ass better find another 3 or their going to die.
Stalin>Hitler
We need a man like Stalin in India, sure were industRIAAlizing, but at the speed of A.mans corolla on the 215 freeway.
all those chamaars should be put to work, we'll lose lives but shit were the 2nd most populated country in the world who gives a f**ck let them die, if its going to bring us up then thats just whats going to need to happen.
Buttt noo we got some pussy farts who dont know shit about running a country, we need a dictator who wants to be the best, first takeover Pakistan then other weak ass countries, then move onto the UK and Canada, and stay allies with US.
|
|
|
Hitlet
Feb 24, 2008 5:54:32 GMT -5
Post by tac on Feb 24, 2008 5:54:32 GMT -5
on the apple iphone ad in the email bit thers a 'satti singh' there
how cool is tht
|
|
|
Hitlet
Feb 24, 2008 18:39:55 GMT -5
Post by Lincoln on Feb 24, 2008 18:39:55 GMT -5
'gulag'
|
|
|
Hitlet
Feb 24, 2008 18:44:02 GMT -5
Post by Lincoln on Feb 24, 2008 18:44:02 GMT -5
make an alliance with mexico so we can phak up the states and giv the mexicans whats righfully theires a.z, new mexico n texas
|
|
|
Hitlet
Feb 24, 2008 18:45:19 GMT -5
Post by Lincoln on Feb 24, 2008 18:45:19 GMT -5
oh yeh stalin was a jew frm gerogia but changed his surname n religion to hide his [sub-human] judaic roots.
he was of no race, linega identity
only fabricated one by marx
|
|
|
Hitlet
Feb 24, 2008 18:49:40 GMT -5
Post by Lincoln on Feb 24, 2008 18:49:40 GMT -5
In the Georgian language "shvili" means son of, or son, as in Johnson. "Djuga" means Jew. Therefore Djugashvili means Jewison. So Joe Stalin's real name, before he changed it, was Joe Jewison. It gets better, his name was Joseph David Djugashvili, a typical Jewish name. During his revolutionary days he changed his name to "Kochba", the leader of the Jews during one of the anti-Roman uprisings of the Jews. Russians don't change their names. Georgians don't change their names. Jews change their names. www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-stalin-3%20Jewish%20Wives%20of%20Joseph%20Stalin.html
|
|
|
Hitlet
Feb 26, 2008 19:25:21 GMT -5
Post by adman on Feb 26, 2008 19:25:21 GMT -5
Did Hitler's appearance make extreme nationalism more appealing to him. He wasn't exactly a looker. A loyal nationalist none the less. A million Jf.k's cannot equal one Hitlet. try the discovery channel dude ur ass been on history (hitlet) channel too long
|
|